Laurenc's Paper

 


Issaqueena Falls, South Carolina



One of my friends is a sociologist who has studied a considerable amount of information about collapse and how society operates within civilization. He is very well-versed in the predicament of ecological overshoot and has written various critiques of different programs which advocate developing fantasies, myths, and fairy tales based upon principles which simply cannot be (infinite growth on a finite planet, for starters). 

His name is Laurenc DeVita, and he currently lives in Alaska. He didn't want a formal introduction; claiming instead that it isn't about him, it is about the words (in the study). So, without further ado, here is Make me dictator and I will save humankind. A rational approach to the emergency of the 21st century.

To say that the idea behind this paper is controversial is putting it lightly. It reeks of hubris, but this is where the magic in the paper actually is. It brings about emotional thinking at first to clear the air and get down to the rational part. Because we are not generally a rational species, but a rationalizing species, we tend to make excuses for all sorts of different things. We justify things after the fact rather than realizing that in some respects, no justifications can be had. In other words, many times these justifications amount to mere denial of reality. Society in many respects simply cannot fathom that our collective addiction to energy is the primary behavioral mechanism responsible for the predicament of ecological overshoot. 

This paper is written in a much different form than most scientific papers, giving it a certain "flair" that few other papers can muster, and DeVita explains the controversy early on, quote:

"This paper is on purpose provocative, in order to trigger off discussion on the future of human society. The paper presents a scenario for dealing with the threat of system collapse, the literary device of the dictator." 


Further into the paper he goes into the idea of human agency, something I have gone into great lengths to explain why we lack agency. He adds why the idea of "coming together" is another fable commonly employed as a means to continue our current set of living arrnagements and explains it based upon the underlying principle of energy costs and complexity, something I brought up in my article about humanity experiencing radical transformation. 

He tackles many of the same topics I have brought up in various articles myself and utilizes the concept of being a dictator to demonstrate how ridiculous these various ideas really are, and his conclusions are not much different than mine. In his conclusion, he also provides the same essence of the "Live Now" ethos in these words, quote: 

"If the dawn finds you alive, thrill at the privilege, and make no assumptions about sunset. 

I congratulate the old and sick and trembling for expecting a rapid death early in the process, and console those who have the strength of character to live on. I give you my blessing: be more decent than you might to each other, and be as happy as you can. Humankind lives on in you."

While I have contributed my thoughts in many pages of articles and files in this blog, Laurenc has done it in one study only 27 pages long!


Live Now!



Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 28, 2022 at 5:55 AM

    Thanks for the link. Laurenc’s ‘study’ is a good encapsulation of everything that must be done…and can’t be,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steven Earl SalmonyApril 29, 2022 at 10:50 AM

      Excellent effort, Laurenc.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome to Problems, Predicaments, and Technology

Image
Welcome to my new blog - titled Problems, Predicaments, and Technology -  because that is the title to a short article I wrote over a year ago to point out the difference between problems and predicaments (often called dilemmas ) and explain the role technology use (and the culture surrounding it) has had in creating most of the predicaments we face today. While this blog is mainly focused on Ecological Overshoot, Abrupt Climate Disruption ( ACD ) and Energy and Resource Decline (generally associated with peak oil and collapse), there are a myriad of other predicaments closely associated with these three that will also be covered. Many scientists focus a large amount of their lives trying to figure out how to solve these predicaments as if they are problems in the hopes of coming up with a way to at least mitigate some of the harm society is doing to life on this planet. My efforts here are to point out that in a very real sense, this has been rooted in denial of reality  and opti
Read more

What Would it Take for Humanity to Experience Radical Transformation?

Image
Today we shall investigate this question: What would it take for humanity to experience radical transformation of individual and collective consciousness within the next decade? This picture looks inviting, doesn't it? But does it realistically represent the world we collectively live in today? In one word, NO. One look at the news stories of today can easily show how individuals, groups, corporations, and nations of all stripes are arguing and fighting for attention, for purposes, and for goals and strategies. Look at social media and it is ripe with every flavor of disagreement known to society. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that there are few things everyone can agree on, and even when one IS found, nobody can agree on the ways to solve what everyone agreed the problems are. Now, throw in a PREDICAMENT instead of a problem and guess what happens? From my experience, when a predicament is put into the mix, most people still look at it from the same standpoint the
Read more

Denial of Reality

Image
  In my last written post (to clarify the difference between the files, which contain only links to outside material), I mentioned denial of reality. You might wonder what this has to do with climate change and extinction. Cognitive dissonance is one of the most powerful mental issues that affects humans. Rob Mielcarski explains the evolution of how this came to be, quote: " The singular emergence of human intelligence, and its ability to write and read this paragraph, evolved in a gene controlled machine with an unusually powerful computer, that was created by an improbable simultaneous adaptation for an extended theory of mind with denial of reality, and whose complexity was enabled by the increased energy per gene provided by mitochondria, that resulted from an accidental endosymbiosis of two prokaryotes, powered by an unintuitive chemiosmotic proton pump, that originated in an alkaline hydrothermal vent, on 1 of 40 billion planets, in 1 of 100 billion galaxies, and that plane
Read more

More Cognitive Dissonance

Image
  In my last post , I expressed my concerns regarding methane emissions along with the growing speed which our collective predicaments appear to be gaining. Then I explained precisely why we have thus far not made any real progress on these predicaments based upon our collective denial , which has a considerable amount to do with our basic human psychology. In conclusion, the reality is that very few people are actually paying an ounce of real attention. What they are paying attention to are all the distractions - the hype, advertising, marketing, and propaganda. Today I bring more evidence of the increasing speed of these predicaments as I recall some of my articles which I had privately hoped might be a long way off into the future. I'm not one to try to evade uncomforting news. If I was, I most certainly wouldn't be reading and watching these articles, reports, studies, videos, and other media to try to understand and comprehend fully where we are and where we're heade
Read more

Fantasies, Myths, and Fairy Tales

Image
  Advertisement from the mid-20th century I have often used this expression (the title) to describe many things people tend to think of as solutions for one thing or another that either are not solutions or are unrealistic at best in terms of actually solving something. For anyone just joining these articles, this post  will help get you started so as to be able to comprehend what this article is about.  As I have expressed before, my deep passion is to help explain where we are (as a species), how we got here, why we are in this mess, and what can and/or cannot be done to "solve" these predicaments. My very first post explained the difference between problems with answers or solutions and predicaments (or dilemmas) with outcomes. In it, we discovered that predicaments don't have solutions, and that every solution proffered for a predicament winds up causing new problems and/or predicaments or comes with unacceptable costs or just simply doesn't solve anything. The re
Read more

What is NTHE and How "near" is Near Term?

Image
I distinctly remember my first introduction to the initialism (or abbreviation or acronym) "NTHE" which ushered me into a whole new set of exploration. I was a member of a climate change group on Facebook at the time (which I had been a member of for quite some time) and I saw a post which was discussing it. I hadn't seen this abbreviation before and wondered what it meant, so I did a search and a whole list of links was presented (as usual) along with the spelled out version, Near Term Human Extinction. I clicked on one which took me to a website blog by Dave Pollard . I started reading and was introduced to another person, Carolyn Baker, with whom Dave had a video interview with. Through this video, I was introduced to another person, a professor by the name of Guy McPherson. A video of him presenting information at an Indiana university, DePauw, where my grandmother attended, was available; so I watched it. The information was stark and I noticed the looks on the ki
Read more

So, What Should We Do?

Image
  Pictures of wildfire damage at Glacier National Park in Montana 2016 What type of activities will help in reducing the effects of ecological overshoot? I'm often asked this question when I point out that solar panels, wind turbines, nuclear energy, hydroelectric dams, EVs, and all other technological devices will not help climate change, pollution loading, or any other predicament under the parent predicament of ecological overshoot: "Well, what are your solutions?" Sadly, this question assumes that I am pointing out a PROBLEM, not a predicament. Predicaments don't have solutions. So, I don't have a solution (and nobody else does either, despite claims to the contrary - more on that in a couple of paragraphs). But I can tell them what WON'T help. Buying more stuff, REGARDLESS of what it is, WILL NOT HELP. Because ecological overshoot is a predicament with an outcome and not a problem with a solution , people need to adjust their expectations accordingly.
Read more