The Great Simplification




I have pointed out several of Nate Hagens' videos and some of his other work in the past, and I was critical of some of his ideas last year. Since then, his videos have been increasingly impressive; especially the series of Great Simplification videos he has done. The Great Simplification - Full Movie, which just came out last week, is really great AND not too long, at less than 33 minutes! I like the fact that he doesn't go into hopium or attempt to predict an overly optimistic outcome. Perhaps he has begun to realize that things aren't really getting better and that some dark clouds have begin to appear on the horizon? I agree with him that human society doesn't HAVE to go the way of the dodo, but certain outcomes have already been baked into the set of predicaments we now face as a result of our past behavior and I don't yet see any massive change of behavior which would result in a better outcome. 

One of the great qualities of this new video is how it explains not only WHERE we are as a species, but HOW we arrived at this point. It goes into WHO and WHAT we are as a species, and WHY we behave and make the choices we make. It really pinpoints why we suffer from a predicament with an outcome and not a problem with a solution. It doesn't offer false hope or a fairy tale ending where everything turns out great at the end. It instead provides the true reality of where we are and the obstacles keeping us from reducing the harm of ecological overshoot. 

Hagens frequently points out how most of society is "energy blind" and this is concomitant with a lack of comprehension of the difference between problems and predicaments and that the master predicament we face, ecological overshoot, caused by technology use, is the root cause of all the other symptom predicaments (climate change, pollution loading, ocean acidification, SLR [Sea Level Rise], loss of the cryosphere, species and biodiversity loss, etc.) which most people ARE at least somewhat familiar with. This video shows the connection between all of these and the hope behind it is to spur interest in reducing ecological overshoot, which will inevitably lead to reductions in severity of the symptom predicaments.

I think that most of the reductions of ecological overshoot will probably come from dieoff, the inevitable crash society will experience as catabolic collapse of industrial civilization deepens. Reductions of ecological overshoot COULD be accomplished by reducing technology use, but this doesn't currently seem like something that would be accepted by society, so reductions of technology use will probably happen according to nature's rules - as energy and resources to power it disappear, technology will slowly also die. 

I truly think that the absolute best ideas about what to do regarding the predicaments we face is to remain as flexible and resilient and fearless as possible. I have spent a great deal of time focused on the predicaments in an effort to explain them so others can understand why there is no real solution to the predicaments (in other words, we cannot think in terms of how the system works in today's world; we must think of how the system will operate in tomorrow's world). This tends to create an atmosphere of fear in anyone who hasn't already been exposed to these facts, and fear is natural but not generally helpful for the most part. We must stop thinking in terms of how to create or obtain more of anything (such as more electricity or more energy or more material items that aren't actual needs), but instead focus on obtaining or creating only what we really need (not what we want). In addition to this, we need to present positive ideas on how to accomplish these tasks in a sustainable manner (to the greatest extent possible). How did we obtain water and food before the industrial revolution? How did we transport waste products or deal with it? How did we provide heat in the winter? Knowing that some of these issues such as climate change are predicaments helps us to keep realistic goals in mind and not fantasy fairy tales which cannot actually be attained. Simply redefining what our goals of life are and what life is really all about is what is required. Once we have redefined our lives, our expectations will follow suit. Right now, most of society has unrealistic goals and expectations. While the new reality may be depressing at first, the truth is that what is coming will most likely be much better for our mental health. 

Problem solving and critical thinking are desperately needed qualities in today's society. A friend says that having the ability to debate with those we do not agree with is an excellent skill to have and also something that is clearly lacking here in the United States. Focusing on what is important and leaving the nonsense (technological dependencies fit into this category) behind will also be extremely important. That which cannot be maintained won't be of much use. These are a few of the qualities which will be desperately needed in the new world unfolding before us. These are just some of the tidbits of knowledge of this series that Hagens has produced and I think these videos are definitely worth the time; especially for those who haven't already been exposed to the reality of our upcoming impasse. 

The Great Simplification is a great series to explore and discover what I point out routinely - that civilization itself is unsustainable and collapse has already begun. I hope Nate will continue interviewing guests and then sharing these with us. I realize that only people interested in these issues will probably take the time to investigate and learn from them, but perhaps as time moves forward, more folks will realize the truth in this series and possibly help create a new awareness within society. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome to Problems, Predicaments, and Technology

Image
Welcome to my new blog - titled Problems, Predicaments, and Technology -  because that is the title to a short article I wrote over a year ago to point out the difference between problems and predicaments (often called dilemmas ) and explain the role technology use (and the culture surrounding it) has had in creating most of the predicaments we face today. While this blog is mainly focused on Ecological Overshoot, Abrupt Climate Disruption ( ACD ) and Energy and Resource Decline (generally associated with peak oil and collapse), there are a myriad of other predicaments closely associated with these three that will also be covered. Many scientists focus a large amount of their lives trying to figure out how to solve these predicaments as if they are problems in the hopes of coming up with a way to at least mitigate some of the harm society is doing to life on this planet. My efforts here are to point out that in a very real sense, this has been rooted in denial of reality  and opti
Read more

What Would it Take for Humanity to Experience Radical Transformation?

Image
Today we shall investigate this question: What would it take for humanity to experience radical transformation of individual and collective consciousness within the next decade? This picture looks inviting, doesn't it? But does it realistically represent the world we collectively live in today? In one word, NO. One look at the news stories of today can easily show how individuals, groups, corporations, and nations of all stripes are arguing and fighting for attention, for purposes, and for goals and strategies. Look at social media and it is ripe with every flavor of disagreement known to society. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that there are few things everyone can agree on, and even when one IS found, nobody can agree on the ways to solve what everyone agreed the problems are. Now, throw in a PREDICAMENT instead of a problem and guess what happens? From my experience, when a predicament is put into the mix, most people still look at it from the same standpoint the
Read more

Denial of Reality

Image
  In my last written post (to clarify the difference between the files, which contain only links to outside material), I mentioned denial of reality. You might wonder what this has to do with climate change and extinction. Cognitive dissonance is one of the most powerful mental issues that affects humans. Rob Mielcarski explains the evolution of how this came to be, quote: " The singular emergence of human intelligence, and its ability to write and read this paragraph, evolved in a gene controlled machine with an unusually powerful computer, that was created by an improbable simultaneous adaptation for an extended theory of mind with denial of reality, and whose complexity was enabled by the increased energy per gene provided by mitochondria, that resulted from an accidental endosymbiosis of two prokaryotes, powered by an unintuitive chemiosmotic proton pump, that originated in an alkaline hydrothermal vent, on 1 of 40 billion planets, in 1 of 100 billion galaxies, and that plane
Read more

More Cognitive Dissonance

Image
  In my last post , I expressed my concerns regarding methane emissions along with the growing speed which our collective predicaments appear to be gaining. Then I explained precisely why we have thus far not made any real progress on these predicaments based upon our collective denial , which has a considerable amount to do with our basic human psychology. In conclusion, the reality is that very few people are actually paying an ounce of real attention. What they are paying attention to are all the distractions - the hype, advertising, marketing, and propaganda. Today I bring more evidence of the increasing speed of these predicaments as I recall some of my articles which I had privately hoped might be a long way off into the future. I'm not one to try to evade uncomforting news. If I was, I most certainly wouldn't be reading and watching these articles, reports, studies, videos, and other media to try to understand and comprehend fully where we are and where we're heade
Read more

Fantasies, Myths, and Fairy Tales

Image
  Advertisement from the mid-20th century I have often used this expression (the title) to describe many things people tend to think of as solutions for one thing or another that either are not solutions or are unrealistic at best in terms of actually solving something. For anyone just joining these articles, this post  will help get you started so as to be able to comprehend what this article is about.  As I have expressed before, my deep passion is to help explain where we are (as a species), how we got here, why we are in this mess, and what can and/or cannot be done to "solve" these predicaments. My very first post explained the difference between problems with answers or solutions and predicaments (or dilemmas) with outcomes. In it, we discovered that predicaments don't have solutions, and that every solution proffered for a predicament winds up causing new problems and/or predicaments or comes with unacceptable costs or just simply doesn't solve anything. The re
Read more

What is NTHE and How "near" is Near Term?

Image
I distinctly remember my first introduction to the initialism (or abbreviation or acronym) "NTHE" which ushered me into a whole new set of exploration. I was a member of a climate change group on Facebook at the time (which I had been a member of for quite some time) and I saw a post which was discussing it. I hadn't seen this abbreviation before and wondered what it meant, so I did a search and a whole list of links was presented (as usual) along with the spelled out version, Near Term Human Extinction. I clicked on one which took me to a website blog by Dave Pollard . I started reading and was introduced to another person, Carolyn Baker, with whom Dave had a video interview with. Through this video, I was introduced to another person, a professor by the name of Guy McPherson. A video of him presenting information at an Indiana university, DePauw, where my grandmother attended, was available; so I watched it. The information was stark and I noticed the looks on the ki
Read more

So, What Should We Do?

Image
  Pictures of wildfire damage at Glacier National Park in Montana 2016 What type of activities will help in reducing the effects of ecological overshoot? I'm often asked this question when I point out that solar panels, wind turbines, nuclear energy, hydroelectric dams, EVs, and all other technological devices will not help climate change, pollution loading, or any other predicament under the parent predicament of ecological overshoot: "Well, what are your solutions?" Sadly, this question assumes that I am pointing out a PROBLEM, not a predicament. Predicaments don't have solutions. So, I don't have a solution (and nobody else does either, despite claims to the contrary - more on that in a couple of paragraphs). But I can tell them what WON'T help. Buying more stuff, REGARDLESS of what it is, WILL NOT HELP. Because ecological overshoot is a predicament with an outcome and not a problem with a solution , people need to adjust their expectations accordingly.
Read more